|
1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
A description of the major issues(s) or problem(s)
2. ANALYSIS OF THE KEY ALTERNATIVES
The results of the analysis of relevant alternatives should be
presented in a concise manner.
3. CONCLUSION
A brief discussion of the logic leading to the selection of a
particular alternative as best should be given here, as well
as a summary as to why the other alternatives were rejected.
4. IMPLEMENTATION
A discussion of how to implement the
decision should be outlined.
|
|
|
In General
Judges will evaluate team presentations examining:
Quality of Analysis
Quality of Presentation
Quality of Question and Answer
Overall Performance
Relevance
Originality
Persuasiveness
|
